Karen Kingston Pfizer Whistle Blower Digs Deeper

CATEGORIES:

Karen Kingston, as a whistle blower has brought us very tangible facts that have teeth. This is likely because she is a former Pfizer employee so she brings us inside knowledge and this recent expose is no different.

Here she exposes important patents that give us a hint at the real purpose of these Covid jabs. When examining the patents it's important to understand that all the mRNA shots including Pfizer BioNtech fall under the Moderna patents.

Case in point from Moderna patent number 10,703,789 B2 from July 7, 2020 and if you look at that patent you can see a description of the 4 lipid nano-particles which encapsulate the mRNA. In section 201 of this patent you can see that they've built in a delivery system that can be delivering the mRNA over periods of hours, days, months, or even years:

In one embodiment, therapeutic nanoparticle may be formulated for sustained release. As used herein, "sustained release" refers to a pharmaceutical composition or compound that conforms to a release rate over a specific period of time. The period of time may include, but is not limited to, hours, days, weeks, months and years.

(page 120 of patent 10,703,789 B2)

The above patent references and is related to another patent which reveals what Dr Zandre Botha discovered when looking at vials under her microscope. This patent is US20100216804A1.

Examining this patent you can see that these nanoparticles contain 4 things one of which is docetaxel, which is a chemotherapy agent. As Karen Kingston explains in the video below one of the working mechanisms behind a chemotherapy agent is to turn off the innate immune function. This has been seen in individuals who are subjected to these experimental shots.

This patent exposes in section 0046:

Disclosed nanoparticles can be used for a variety of applications, such as, without limitation, drug delivery, gene therapy, medical diagnosis, and for medical therapeutics for cancer, pathogen-borne diseases, hormone-related diseases, reaction-by-products associated with organ transplants, and other abnormal cell or tissue growth.

Then in section 0074:

Disclosed nanoparticles may include optional targeting moieties, which may be selected to ensure that the nanoparticles selectively attach to, or otherwise associate with, a selected marker or target. For example, in some embodiments, disclosed nanoparticles may be functionalized with an amount of targeting moiety effective for the treatment of prostate cancer in a subject (e.g., a low-molecular weight PSMA ligand). Through functionalization of nanoparticle surfaces with such targeting moieties, the nanoparticles are effective only at targeted sites, which minimizes adverse side effects and improves efficacy. Targeted delivery also allows for the administration of a lower dose of therapeutic agent, which may reduce undesirable side effects commonly associated with traditional treatments of disease.

This means they have built in targeted delivery and are delivering these nanoparticles intentionally to specific organs which would mean that what is referred to as "adverse events" may not be adverse at all but rather intentional based on the design of the encapsulated nanoparticles.

Moving on to the next referenced patent US20120265001A1 which discusses composite magnetic nanoparticles for a drug delivery system. This brings light to what many microscopists worldwide have been discovering in looking at vials under the microscope, they are seeing all these nanoparticles that reflect light and these are literally magnetic nanoparticles, originally developed for delivery of chemotherapy agents to targeted organs (for example the organ affected by cancer).

This stuff may seem like science fiction, and it really is because in reality it shows again how crude and unscientific our medical establishment is with their toxic drugs and how willing they are to test experimental therapies on healthy humans.

In my opinion it is one thing for someone with terminal cancer to be given a choice to take an experimental protocol like this but to give these sorts of injections to entire populations of relatively healthy humans is a clear violation of the Nuremberg code and plenty of other humanitarian laws.

Moving on to the graphene oxide carbon nanotubes the patent for that is US20130251618A1 which is referenced from the master Moderna patent clarifies that the presence of graphene oxide in these shots can't simply be "debunked" as some conspiracy theory by the corporate shills any longer.

As usual my videos are always on my bitchute channel which you can subscribe to right here:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CL6NVTZ5Q3Yv/

Please share this post far and wide and get this information out there to people who care so we can stop the censorship. Also share your thoughts in the comments below.

 

Sources:

https://www.modernatx.com/sites/default/files/US10703789.pdf

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100216804A1/en

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120265001A1/en

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130251618A1/en

Share The Knowledge!

2 comments on “Karen Kingston Pfizer Whistle Blower Digs Deeper”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Knowing The Truth Topics

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram