You've probably heard about it if you haven't actually read the report from TheExpose.uk about Vaccine Induced AIDS. The phenomena of drug induced AIDS actually goes back to the beginning of the AIDS epidemic and we clearly known about by players like Fraudulent Fauci back in the 1980s.
How can we be sure?
Well drugs like Amyl Nitrite inhalers were known to be immune-suppressive and marketed heavily to the gay population as "poppers". These drugs combined with other immune-suppressive drugs were known to be driving the 
AIDS epidemic despite the fraud of the HIV virus cause. This fact was articulated well in books such as "AIDS Inc." by Jon Rappaport and "AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire" by Nancy Turner Banks.
So how much of a surprise would it be that an injected drug, a genetic code injection in this case, would actually disrupt immune function rather than support it?
AZT is another example. This family of drugs (created by Burroughs Wellcome as I recall) was originally used intentionally to suppress the immune system for organ transplant recipients. It became common that some of these transplant recipients would get hallmark AIDS conditions such as Kaposi Sarcoma (a type of skin cancer) and Pneumocystis (sp?) Pneumonia but when they lowered the dose of AZT family drugs or eliminated the drug these conditions would go away. (see Nancy Turner Banks citation)
Even if you prefer to believe that there is not a cabal out there which exists against the best interest of the people, time and time again pharma fails to deliver it's promises of a cure.
This can be seen in the Vioxx scandal that lead arguably to over 100,000 deaths hidden in adverse cardiovascular events and while I'm not footnoting that statistic I believe that was covered in Nancy Turner Banks incredible work cited above.
But getting back to TheExpose.uk work.
I've read their short article on the PHE UK research and it was so brief that it left me with no choice but to examine the sources. My assessment is pretty clear that Public Health England is not reporting the same conclusion as TheExpose.
So why is this?
I believe the crux of this is that PHE is hiding important statistics in a clever sleight of hand. The most important statistic that PHE seems to have left out of all their graphs and conclusions is this one labeled: "Second dose ≥14 days before specimen date".
Within that label sits a majority of hospitalizations and deaths!
When they eliminate that statistic from the graphs it hides the majority of hospitalizations and deaths of the vaccinated and highlights the hospitalizations and deaths of the "unvaccinated" which wouldn't show such high peaks if they were shown next to a higher peak that included these "Second dose..." cohorts.
To give an idea of the numbers in this research let's look at "Death within 28 days of positive PCR test" in the 80+ age range (of week 41 referenced below) where we see 1179 out of a total of 1382 deaths which were in the above cited "Second dose ≥14 days before specimen date". It's the majority of vaccinated dehttps://theexpose.uk/2021/10/15/its-worse-than-we-thought-fully-covid-vaccinated-ade/aths and these were left out of all the graphs!
As you can see that's the majority of the deaths and you can also see that it's the majority of deaths in the "Death within 60 days of positive PCR test" 80+ age cohort where we see 1447 out of 1680 total deaths. One could try to argue that more deaths are likely in this age range and while that's true the same phenomenon shows in the lower age range albeit with smaller numbers overall.
And by the way, in my assessment I ignored the statistics on "case rates" because those are based on PCR testing and not symptomatic cases. These PHE reports also highlight the risk of "asymptomatic spread" which has been proven in plenty of studies to be negligent. Please share feedback if you believe I should be citing on this I've neglected it because to me it seems like old news.
So while I agree with the conclusion that TheExpose.uk made:
These immune system degradations could be caused by ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement – where the vaccine induced antibodies start working in reverse) and be specific to Covid, or could be more general and result in a form of vaccine mediated AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). The fact that the 3rd Jabs worked in Israel (for a short period of time before the 4th jabs were proposed) means that vaccine antibodies do still have a protective effect immediately after vaccination. So that rules out ADE.
The falling efficacy of the vaccines does not asymptotically approach zero (which would mean that vaccines merely lose effectiveness over time). It goes straight through zero and then goes dangerously negative (which means the vaccines become toxic to the immune system). Then it goes more negative in a linear manner week on week. If this continues then the vaccines will completely destroy the part of your immune system which deals with Covid by the end of January.
Yet I'm still not so clear having reviewed the source data where exactly they came up with their conclusion and how exactly they totaled up their statistics because the graphs they reported are not (from my study) shown in the source data. Maybe they totaled a few of the different tables from the source document but in this age of transparency my feedback to TheExpose.uk is that their reporting seems rather incomplete.
Now maybe I missed something in my review of the original source documents but either way TheExpose.uk seems to have made a rather thin post on this subject given the huge amount of data packed into the original sources and the fact that their conclusion of the data contrasts sharply with that of TheExpose.uk as well as my own conclusion.
Here's a great explanation of how vaccine induced immune dysfunction works:
And here is a video hyping up the post from TheExpose.uk if you like things like that 😉
As usual you can see my video posts and subscribe to my bitchute channel right here:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CL6NVTZ5Q3Yv/
I hope you found this post to be helpful as an interpretation to research that is being spread around frantically right now without any level headed examination.
Please give this post a share and spread the word.
Sources:
"AIDS, Opium, Diamonds and Empire" by Nancy Turner Banks
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1019992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1022238/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_39.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1025358/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-41.pdf
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/15/its-worse-than-we-thought-fully-covid-vaccinated-ade/
Featured Photo By Edifica
Amyl Nitrite Image courtesy of: alexliivet
Vaccine Art Image courtesy of: ebrkut
