Since this doctor blew the whistle on the new Pfizer vaccine you've likely seen a number of hit pieces on him. This, of course, is common practice now in this reality of censorship we live in today. If the voice doesn't speak the narrative of the new pharma paradigm a well organized spin campaign will follow.
Dr Michael Yeadon has a degree in Biochemistry and Toxicology as well as a PhD in Pharmacology. As an expert in allergy, immunology and respiratory diseases he worked for Pfizer as vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of their Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit. This professional research scientist has over three decades of esteemed experience and his opinion should be considered and not brushed off as some "conspiracy theorist".
So if you're not quite ready to accept the alternative theories of viruses as signaling molecules to communicate about toxins we are being exposed to or about exosomes, then Dr Mike Yeadon may be a great source of more conventional wisdom for you to consider.
In the video below you'll hear a lot of critique about the handling of Covid-19 by the medical systems (specifically in the UK but it's globally the same) including SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group for Emergencies) and how they determined early on that because the SARS-Cov2 was considered a "Novel" (new) virus that no one had any immunity to it.
Yeadon claims that scientifically this is completely backwards and that anyone who has been exposed to other corona viruses will already have levels of immunity against it. Prior immunity is thus the reason that so many people can be exposed to SARS-Cov2 and never fall ill.
My opinion: Some other researchers consider these new exposures to similar new viruses as giving our systems an "upgrade" upon exposure. But for many healthy individuals this can may not involve any symptoms at all.
Also in the video below at time stamp 12:30 you'll learn about what Dr Yeadon calls "Cold Positives" on the PCR testing. He is one of the most vocal, mainstream critics of the unreliability of the PCR tests which are still the most common tests that are the root cause of the "surging" case numbers. Without these flawed tests we simply wouldn't have substantiation for continued lockdowns and closed businesses which are plaguing economies worldwide.
Dr Mike Yeadon is currently a freelance consultant working for various biotech companies
He feels this quote is very important in this discussion:
"It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they've been fooled." Mark Twain
Dr Yeadon brings up some research regarding a connection between the mechanism behind the Pfizer covid-19 vaccine and the way a foetus develops in the womb and has warned Pfizer of this risk and published
He believes and states in the video below where you can dig deeper into this subject that while PCR testing numbers will continue to rise and people may continue to die (with a positive PCR test) that there is no longer any connection between these two pieces of data.
Here Reiner Fuellmich interviews Dr Mike Yeadon and while it's a long interview if you really like to know the details of what's going on with the rollout of further medical interventions with Covid-19.
Topics included are cross immunity, herd immunity, incorrect predictions of lethality and vulnerability and the politics that have intervened into the pandemic which these top experts claim has ended in the UK at the end of Summer 2020.
Let's dig deeper into the question of the effects of covid-19 vaccines on pregnant women and fertility for future pregnancy.
Syncytin-1 is a vital protein for the synthesis of human placenta in fetal development. Due to it's similarity to the spike protein on coronaviruses there may be risk of training the female human body to attack syncytin-1 leading to infertility in a percentage of women for a potentially unknown duration after a vaccine injection.
Former Pfizer vice president and scientific director Dr. Michael Yeadon and German lung specialist and parliamentarian Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed an urgent application with the European Medicine Agency calling for the immediate suspension of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies – particularly the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
Yeadon and Wodarg say the studies should be halted until a design study is available which addresses a host of serious safety concerns expressed by a growing body of renowned scientists who are skeptical of how quickly the vaccines are being developed, according to Germany’s 2020 News.
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se. -2020 News
The pair also point to concerns raised in previous studies involving other coronaviruses – including (via 2020 News):
- The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
- The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
- The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
- The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
Please share your thoughts on this in the comments below. If you've found this information helpful go ahead and share it with your friends on your favorite social media platform and let's see if it gets censored ;-).