One of the biggest new stories that broke recently is "Project Salus" which is a combined effort of DoD (US Dept of Defense) and JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center) to analyze data of 5.6 million Medicare recipients (65 and older) in healthcare outcomes.
A lot of new data has come out of the acquisition of this data but the bottom line is this: the majority of hospitalizations in 2021 is among already covid "vaccinated" individuals. This clarifies that the media has been lying to you when they tell you the hospitals are filled with "unvaccinated" people.
They can manipulate the statistics (calling people unvaccinated until 14 days after their 2nd shot!) for only so long when data like this comes out. Clearly this is not a "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
Also included are comparisons between the different brands of shots and hospitalization and death statistics.
This is very interesting data because it shows that consistently the longer the time after the injection for both Pfizer and Moderna the more breakthrough cases are reported but what is not clear is whether these "breakthrough cases" are just a positive PCR test or if symptomatic illness was required.
From the above graph we can see that the "breakthrough" cases continue to rise and that an estimated 71% of these occurred in the "unvaccinated" when considering the 65+ age group.
This Project Salus data reveals through advanced data analysis that what a lot of doctors have been speculating about ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) with mRNA injected technology may be true and that it increases with time post-injection.
Throughout the slides, “VE” refers to vaccine effectiveness. “Breakthrough” means a failed vaccine, where a fully vaccinated person is diagnosed with covid. Many of those people require hospitalization and ICU treatments (see the slides below).
Some of the key findings of the Project Salus analysis include:
The effectiveness of mRNA vaccines is confirmed to wane over time.
With each passing week, those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines show an increased risk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization. From the analysis: “Odds ratio increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination.”
Natural immunity works: A prior covid infection greatly reduces the odds of a vaccinated person needing hospitalization from a subsequent infection.
Now it appears safe to expect more adverse "vaccine" events as we move into the colder time of year with shorter days in the Northern hemisphere. These will likely be blamed on "Covid 19" with the convenience of the fraudulent PCR tests that can match up positive whenever needed.
I saw this coming last year when a rather low IQ NPR scientific reporter claimed someone could get "Covid Toe" when there was no scientific evidence of this potential. Here we are about 12 months later and the serious adverse vascular damage from the covid shots is being blamed on a broad sweeping diagnosis of "Covid-19" simply based on an erroneous PCR test being positive.
Here's a list of reported vascular adverse events (from vigiaccess.org) for Covid 19 vaccination products:
Hot flush (12172)
Deep vein thrombosis (10853)
Peripheral coldness (5325)
Hypertensive crisis (2420)
Thrombophlebitis superficial (1841)
Circulatory collapse (1543)
Blood pressure fluctuation (1097)
Venous thrombosis limb (915)
Peripheral vascular disorder (869)
Venous thrombosis (764)
Varicose vein (664)
Raynaud's phenomenon (605)
Vascular pain (587)
Orthostatic hypotension (511)
Giant cell arteritis (366)
Peripheral artery thrombosis (282)
Vein disorder (282)
Poor peripheral circulation (274)
Peripheral ischaemia (269)
Internal haemorrhage (260)
Jugular vein thrombosis (220)
Peripheral venous disease (219)
Neurogenic shock (214)
Pelvic venous thrombosis (187)
Peripheral circulatory failure (180)
Arterial thrombosis (179)
Arterial occlusive disease (167)
Phlebitis superficial (167)
Capillary fragility (163)
Subclavian vein thrombosis (159)
Aortic dissection (154)
The number next to each condition is the number of reported cases of that particular adverse reaction. Now you know how to respond when someone claims that "Covid 19" is a vascular disease. I say it wasn't vascular until they got the needle involved, prior to that it was a respiratory syndrome and when things are functioning properly the lungs are a protective barrier for airborne toxins shielding them from the blood.
This is why I consider the needle the necessary "vector" in order to trigger any sort of vascular syndrome in the case of Covid 19.
After all, vectors for disease are an important factor to consider. Look we wouldn't likely have Lyme disease if the borrelia spirochete wasn't carried by the tick vector. These were experimented with at the tick colony at Plum Island off the coast of Long Island NY decades ago prior to that disease breaking in nearby Lyme Connecticut.
It's possible the Covid-19 engineered spike protein may only have mild affects on a truly healthy individual when exposed to the lungs, but when carried on a injected needle vector into your tissue evading the natural defense mechanisms it could do massive amounts of toxic damage to the tissue.
So is this a case where the real disease is the medical intervention that is supposed to cure the disease?
Here are two interviews that are related to this topic.
The first is with Attorney Thomas Renz who I believe was the first to break this story about Project Salus:
The second one is an interview with James Grundvig who has done extensive research on the corruption at the CDC and published a book on the subject in 2016:
Thanks for reading and don't forget to share this post with your inquisitive friends and family to help smash censorship!
Featured Photo By L00KING closer now